Nma/3859/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -City 5, Mumbai v. Mr Bansi Jaising

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3859 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3859 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2699 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2699 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances,Court ’s : orders or directions & : Prothonotary’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr R. Ashokan, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr A. N. Kotangle a/w Mr B. K.Barve a/w Mr A.D. Nargarjun i/b B. K. Barve & Co. Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 12TH DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 12TH DECEMBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. 3. For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay of 132 days in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant-applicant. Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C.DAGA,J.)