Nma/3871/2005 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai v. National Safety Council
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3871/2005 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai v. National Safety Council
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/3871/2005 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai v. National Safety Council, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3871 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1606 OF 2005
The Director of Income-Tax(Exemption) ..Appellant Mumbai
National Safety Council..RespondentNavi Mumbai
Mr.R.K.Sharma with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellantMr.Poras Kaka with Mr.Nishit Doshi i/b.CrawfordBayley & Co., Advocate, for Respondent
DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning a
delay of 504 days in filing of the main appeal.
Considering the reasons which are given for the
delay caused and which are not controverted, we
accept the cause shown as sufficient cause and
condone the delay. Office to number the appeal and
place the same for admission in usual course.
2.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue