Nma/387/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.shreepati Infra Realty Ltd
High Court
08 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/387/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.shreepati Infra Realty Ltd
Date of order
08 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/387/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.shreepati Infra Realty Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 387 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1251 OF 2015
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5Mumbai .. Applicant In the matter bewteen
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5Mumbai .. Appellant
v/s.
Shreepati Infra Realty Ltd.
..Respondent
Ms. Padma Divakar for the applicant / orig. appellant Ms. Nupur Desai i/b Markand Gandhi & Co. for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 8[th] JUNE, 2018.
P.C.
1.This application has been taken out to recall the order dated 29[th ]November, 2017 passed by this Court dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution. This application also seeks condonation of 5 days delay in filing this motion.
2.On 29[th] November, 2017, when this appeal was dismissed for
non-prosecution, the advocate who was briefed by the Revenue was on leave as is indicated by her letters dated 3[rd] November, 2017 and 7[th ]
387-18-NMA-9=.doc
November, 2017 to the Officers of the Department. However, substitute arrangements remanied to be done. It was in the aforesaid circumstances, that the appeals remained unattended on 29[th ]November, 2017.
3.We are satisfied with the reasons set out in the affidavit-in-support and allowed the Notice of Motion in term of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.