Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3916/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3916/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Shri Raj Kanwar

High Court 29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3916/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Shri Raj Kanwar
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/3916/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Shri Raj Kanwar, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3916 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.2257 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-11..Appellant Mumbai V/s. Raj Kanwar..Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellant Mr.Parag S. Savla with Mr.Ajay R. Singh, Advocate,for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 232 days in filing of the main appeal. Onperusal of the affidavit in support we find thatthe file was sent to the Panel Counsel on 24[th]February, 2006 and the draft appeal was received on5[th] October, 2006. A period of 8 months cannot besaid to be reasonable. It is also seen that taxeffect in the case is less than 4 lakhs. In thecircumstances, the cause shown is not sufficient cause. Hence, the Notice of Motion standsdismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan