In Nma/39/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Ravalgaon Sugar Farm Ltd Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the same reasons, the present appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.39 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2925 OF 2008
The CIT-2 )..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Ravalgaon Sugar Farm Ltd.,Mumbai)..Respondents
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta @ P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.B.V.Jhaveri with Priti V.Shukla for the
respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 10.2.2009.
PC
1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned.
Office to register the appeal.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2925 OF 2008
1. The questions which arise in this appeal are
similar questions arose in Income Tax Appeal (L)
No.2923 of 2008. We have disposed off the said
appeal by a separate reasoned order passed today. For the same reasons, the present appeal also stands
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue