Case LawHigh Court › Nma/3922/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-...

Nma/3922/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Earnest Exports Ltd

High Court 17 Nov 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3922/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Earnest Exports Ltd
Date of order
17 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/3922/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Earnest Exports Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Notice of Motion and the Review petition are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3922 OF 2009WITHREVIEW PETITION (L) NO.45 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1611 OF 2007 The Commissioner Income Tax ..Petitioner. V/s. M/s. Earnest Exports Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for petitioner. Mr. S.C. Tiwari with Ms. Sutapa Saha for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, 22 days delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. Review petition be numbered. 2.Mr.Tiwari waives service for the respondent in the Review petition. By consent of parties, Review petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. Review petition is filed by the revenue to recall the order passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1611 of 2007 dated 7th May, 2009. We were taken through the judgment of the Apex Court {Honda Siel Power Products V/s. CIT (2007) 295 ITR 466 (S.C.)} referred to in the said order dated 7th May, 2009. Prima facie, we are satisfied that the learned counsel appearing for the revenue had wrongly conceded under bonafide belief that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal was covered by the judgment of the Apex Court referred to above and subsequently the impugned order dated 7th May 2009 came to be passed. The order dated 7th May, 2009 is recalled and the Income Tax Appeal No.1611 of 2007 is restored to the file. The parties are free the argue the appeal on its merits. 2.Notice of Motion and the Review petition are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan