Case Law › High Court › Nma/3924/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/3924/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Shri Kewal K.suri

High Court 04 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Dec 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/3924/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Shri Kewal K.suri, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3924 OF2006inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2179 of 2006inINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2006The Commissionerof Income Tax II Mumbai.. AppellantvsShri Kewal K.Suri..RespondentMr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMs Beena Pillai for RespondentCORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.S.MOHITE, JJDATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007P.C.1. There is a delay of about 41 days. In theaffidavit supporting the motion cause shown issufficient cause. Considering the same the delay [is condoned. Office to register the appeal.(F.I.Rebello, J)(R.S.Mohite, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.