In Nma/3941/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum-City-9 v. Shri Sunil Dhawan, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3941 OF 2005IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1725 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai.V/s.Shri Sunil Dhavan,Mumbai.A.S.Rao for the appellant.Vipul Joshi for the respondent.
... Appellant.... Respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 17th July 2006.
P.C. :----.parties....order with no order as to costs.
Heard learned counsel for the rival
Delay is condoned by consent of parties.Motion stands disposed of in terms of this
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue