Case LawHigh Court › Nma/399/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/399/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/399/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/399/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Vijay Grihnirman Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane * 1/2 * NMA-399-2018 (SR.16) Friday, 6.7.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 399 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 1371 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-2 ….Applicant (Original Appellant) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-2….AppellantV/s.Vijay Grihnirman Pvt. Ltd.….Respondent * * * * * Ms. Padma Divakar, Advocate for the applicant-originalappellant. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &DATE :-6TH JULY, 2018. SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. P.C. :- 1. Ms. Divakar, learned Counsel for the applicant states that the respondent is served. None appears inspite of service. 2. This application has been taken out for condonation of Rane * 2/2 * NMA-399-2018 (SR.16) 114 days delay in taking out this motion to set aside the self-operating order dated 7th September, 2017 passed by theProthonotary and Senior Master rejecting the petition forthfailure to have removed the office objections on or before 5October, 2017 under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.)Rules. 3. We have perused the additional affidavit of Mr. HarshadM. Karnik, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax dated 25thJune, 2018 in support of the motion. We are satisfied with thereasons indicated therein. 4. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms ofprayer clauses (a) and (b). 5. Needless to state that if the office objections are notremoved within a period of four weeks from today, the appealshall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan