In Nma/4003/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-11, Mumbai v. M/S. Ramnord Research Laboratories P. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Notice of Motion as well as the Income Tax Appeal are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4003 OF 2005INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2961 OF 2001IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.723 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Ramnord Research Laboratories P. Ltd.
..Respondent.
None for the appellant.
Ms. Kyati Ghevari i/b. Dhru & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.S. DALVI, JJ.
DATED : 29TH MARCH, 2011
P.C. :-
None present for the Appellant. Notice of Motion as well as the Income Tax Appeal are dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SMT. R.S. DALVI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue