Nma/405/2006 Of Sthe Commissioner Of Income-Tax12/Mum v. Nayankuamr And Co
High Court
17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/405/2006 Of Sthe Commissioner Of Income-Tax12/Mum v. Nayankuamr And Co
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/405/2006 Of Sthe Commissioner Of Income-Tax12/Mum v. Nayankuamr And Co, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 405 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.184 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 405 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.184 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Nayankumar & Co. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
Mr.F.B.Andyarjuna, senior counsel with J.N.Shah for
respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Appellant has set out delay as 278 days.
According to the respondents, the delay is 553 days.
2. There is an affidavit in support of the
Motion. After considering the affidavit, we find that
the matter was pending with the Law Department between
6/7/2004 and 21/10/2005. There is no explanation
whatsoever for such a long delay. Considering the
above, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient
cause. Hence Notice of Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.