Case LawHigh Court › Nma/4072/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4072/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Auto Division , Mumbai

High Court 04 Dec 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4072/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Auto Division , Mumbai
Date of order
04 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/4072/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Auto Division , Mumbai, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4072 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2073 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Applicant v/s. Metro Motors Auto ..Respondent None for the applicant CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J. DATED : 4[th] DECEMBER, 2015. P.C. 1.The present notice of motion has been numbered as Notice of Motion No.4072 of 2009. This is by mistake. The Registry has placed on record a report dated 3[rd] December, 2015 pointing out that there is only one notice of motion which has been filed by the appellant i.e. Notice of Motion No.4073 of 2009. 2.Therefore, the present notice of motion has to be accordingly numbered as Notice of Motion No.4073 of 2009 and not Notice of Motion No.4072 of 2009. The Notice of Motion No.4073 of 2009 has already been disposed of on 29[th] July, 2011. 3.Consequently, the present notice of motion is wrongly on board. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan