Nma/408/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-1 v. Atomstroyexport
High Court
15 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/408/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-1 v. Atomstroyexport
Date of order
15 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/408/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-1 v. Atomstroyexport, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: It is made clear that, if the office objections are not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1/2 * NMA—408-2018 (SR.15)
Friday, 15.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 408 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2027 OF 2017
The Commissioner of IncomeTax, International Taxation-1 ….Applicant
(Original Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
The Commissioner of IncomeTax, International Taxation ….AppellantV/s.Atomstroyexport….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Tejinder Singh, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Arsh Misra a/w. Ms. Khusbhoo Agarwal i/by. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-15TH JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.This application seeks condonation of 91 days
Rane
* 2/2 * NMA—408-2018 (SR.15)Friday, 15.6.2018
delay in taking out this application for setting aside the order dated 16th November, 2017 passed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules for non-removal of office objections.
2.
We have perused the affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion and are satisfied with the reasons stated therein for the delay in taking out this application, as well as, non-removal of office objections in time. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
3.
It is made clear that, if the office objections are
not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue