Case Law › High Court › Nma/4151/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4151/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Cam Enterprises

High Court 04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/4151/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-18, Mumbai v. M/S. Cam Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4151 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1764 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax..Appellant Mumbai City-18Mumbai V/s. M/s.Cam Enterprises..Respondent Mr.R.G.Bhat with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate, for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 558 days in filing of the main appeal.Perusal of the affidavit in support indicates thatthe Chief CIT granted the approval for filing theappeal on 4[th] June, 2004. The appeal was filed on21[st] December, 2005. No dates are given in respectof the events occurred between 4[th] June, 2004 and21[st] December, 2005. The cause shown therefore,cannot be said to be sufficient cause. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.