Nma/4156/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bindi Chemicals And Agencies Trading P. Ltd
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4156/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bindi Chemicals And Agencies Trading P. Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/4156/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bindi Chemicals And Agencies Trading P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4156 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1642 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3..Appellant Mumbai
V/s.
M/s.Bindi Chemical & Agencies Trading ..Respondent P. Ltd.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.Raj Darak, Advocate, for Respondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &
DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 558 days in filing of the main appeal.Perusal of the affidavit in support indicates thatthe file was sent to the Ministry of Law for
drafting an appeal memo on 25[th] March, 2004 and thedraft was received on or around 17[th] May, 2005. Aperiod of one year and two months for drafting the
appeal cannot be said to be reasonable. In ourview, the cause shown does not amount to sufficientcause. Hence, the Notice of Motion standsdismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue