Case Law › High Court › Nma/4158/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4158/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bloom Trading Ltd

High Court 04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/4158/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bloom Trading Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4158 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1641 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3..Appellant Mumbai M/s.Bloom Trading Ltd...Respondent Mumbai Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.Raj Darak, Advocate, for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 556 days in filing of the aforesaidappeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support wefind that the file was sent to the Ministry of Lawfor drafting an appeal memo on 25[th] March, 2004 andthe draft was received on or around 17[th] May, 2005.A period of one year and two months for drafting the appeal cannot be said to be reasonable. In ourview, the cause shown does not amount to sufficientcause. Hence, the Notice of Motion standsdismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.