Nma/4185/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central) Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Videocon Appliances Ltd
High Court
04 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4185/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central) Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Videocon Appliances Ltd
Date of order
04 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/4185/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central) Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Videocon Appliances Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4185 OF 2006inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2129 of 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.OF 2006The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral II.. AppellantvsM/s Videocon Appliances Ltd..RespondentMr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMs.Rajani Rajda for RespondentCORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.S.MOHITE, JJDATED:4TH DECEMBER, 2007P.C.1. There is a delay of about 235 days inpreferring the appeal. There is an affidavit ofMr.K.P.Nigam. Contents of the affidavit have notbeen rebutted though Respondent has been served.In our view, cause shown would amount to sufficientcause. Hence, motion is made absolute. Office toregister the appeal. Appellants to serve acomplete copy of the appeal memo along with theExhibits on the respondents.
(F.I.Rebello, J)(R.S.Mohite, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue