Nma/4190/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ii v. Mr Hemdev Hareshkumar G
High Court
07 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4190/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ii v. Mr Hemdev Hareshkumar G
Date of order
07 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/4190/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ii v. Mr Hemdev Hareshkumar G, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4190 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4190 OF 2007
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1981 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1981 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Hemdev Hareshkumar ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan with A.D.Kango for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
None for the respondent. The Motion is filed for
condonation of 521 days delay in filing the above
appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the
Notice of Motion. The impugned order is dated
19/09/2005. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
granted approval on 23/03/2006 for filing the appeal.
However, the appeal was filed on 31/8/2007. The
reasons given for the delay in filing the appeal is
that it was beyond the control of the appellant’s
office and non availability of Court fees stamp. The
reasons given are totally unsatisfactory. No case is
made out for condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is
dismissed with no order as to costs.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.