Case Law › High Court › Nma/4200/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4200/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. K. E. C. Interntional Ltd

High Court 04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/4200/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. K. E. C. Interntional Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4200 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1831 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax-8..Appellant Mumbai V/s. M/s.K.E.C.International Ltd...Respondent Mr.S.M.Shah & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellant CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 581 days in filing of the main appeal.On perusal of the affidavit in support it is clearthat the Chief CIT granted the approval for filingthe appeal on 24[th] May, 2004 and the appeal came tobe filed on 29[th] December, 2005 and no dates havebeen given in respect of the events which occurredbetween 24[th] May, 2004 and 29[th] December, 2005. Inour view, the cause shown does not amount tosufficient cause. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.