Case LawHigh Court › Nma/4226/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4226/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 17 Mumbai v. Shri Balwant Mehtalia

High Court 04 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4226/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 17 Mumbai v. Shri Balwant Mehtalia
Date of order
04 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/4226/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 17 Mumbai v. Shri Balwant Mehtalia, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4226 OF 2006inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2154 of 2006The Commissioner of Income TaxCity 17 Mumbai.. AppellantvsShri Balwant Mehtalia ..RespondentMr.R.Asokan for AppellantMr.M.Subramaniam with Mr.V.S.Hedade for RespondentCORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.S.MOHITE, JJDATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007P.C.1. There is a delay of 279 days in preferring theappeal. Mr.K.K.Rath has filed an affidavit insupport of the motion. Learned counsel for therespondent pionts out that the cause shown would noamount to sufficient cause and consequently thedelay should not be condoned.2. We have considered para 4 of the affidavitshowing the cause. We find that no explanationwhatsoever has been given for the delay from22.3.2006 and 22.8.2006. In our view, as the causewould not amount to sufficient cause, Motion is dismissed. (F.I.Rebello, J) (R.S.Mohite, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan