Case LawHigh Court › Nma/424/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/424/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Diamond Investments And Properties

High Court 28 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/424/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Diamond Investments And Properties
Date of order
28 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/424/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Diamond Investments And Properties, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 5.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 424 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1272 OF 2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-23 .. Applicant In the matter betweenThe Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-23.. Appellant v/s. Diamond Investments and Properties ..Respondent Ms. Padma Divakar for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent J.J. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, DATED : 28[th] JUNE, 2018. P.C. 1.Ms. Divakar, learned Counsel for the applicant states that the respondent is served. None appears for the respondent despite service. 2.This application has been taken out for condonation of 205 days delay in taking out this motion to set aside the self-operating order dated 24[th] August, 2017 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master rejecting the petition for failure to have removed the office objections on or before 21[st] September, 2017 under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules. 3.We have perused the affidavit of Ms. Sangeeta R. Rao, Income Tax Officer, dated 25[th] April, 2018 in support of the motion. We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein. 4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 5.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan