Nma/4253/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. M/S M.c. Bokadia
High Court
04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4253/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. M/S M.c. Bokadia
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/4253/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. M/S M.c. Bokadia, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4253 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2267 OF 2007
The CIT City-11 ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.M.C.Bokadia ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4th March, 2008.
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 543 days delay in
filing the appeal. A perusal of
affidavit-in-support to the Motion indicates that the CCIT-11 granted approval for filing the appeal on 13.3.2006 and thereafter the appeal was filed on
the CCIT-11 granted approval for filing the appeal on 13.3.2006 and thereafter the appeal was filed on 28.9.2007. No dates have been given in respect of
events which occurred between the aforesaid two
dates. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does
not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion
dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2267 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2267 OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue