Case LawHigh Court › Nma/4255/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4255/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S. United Stationery Mart

High Court 29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4255/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S. United Stationery Mart
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/4255/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S. United Stationery Mart, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4255 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1627 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-13..Appellant Mumbai V/s. M/s.United Stationery Mart..Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate, for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 427 days in filing of the main appeal. Onperusal of the affidavit in support we find thatthe last date for filing the appeal was 1[st] July,2005 and the same was filed on 31[st] August, 2006.No dates relating to the events which occurredbetween the aforesaid two dates are given. Theexplanation given is vague. The cause shown is notsufficient cause. Consequently, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan