Case Law › High Court › Nma/4263/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4263/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. M/S Eagle Films

High Court 04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/4263/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. M/S Eagle Films, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4263 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2243 OF 2007 The CIT City-7 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Eagle Films ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Ms.Beena Pillai for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4th March, 2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 999 days delay in filing the appeal. A perusal of affidavit-in-support indicates that the file was sent to the Advocate for drafting on 4.1.2005 but the appeal was filed on 27.9.2007. No dates have been given in respect of events which occurred between the aforesaid two dates. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2243 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2243 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.