Nma/427/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Zahid Abbas Mankad
High Court
14 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/427/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Zahid Abbas Mankad
Date of order
14 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/427/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Zahid Abbas Mankad, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 5.Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within a perod of 4 weeks from today, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 427 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 137 OF 2018
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20Mumbai
.. Applicant
In the matter betweenThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20Mumbai .. Appellant
v/s.
Zahid Abbas Mankad
..Respondent
Ms. Padma Divakar for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 14[th] JUNE, 2018.
P.C.
1.Ms. Divakar, learned Counsel appearing in support of the application states that the respondent has been served the present motion and she undertakes to file her affidavit of service on or before 18[th] June, 2018.
2.This application seeks a condonation of 67 days delay in filing an
appeal from the order dated 3[rd] May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal.
3.We have perused the affidavit in support of the motion of the ITO Ms. Sheela Jacob, dated 7[th] May, 2018 and are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the appeal.
4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
5.Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within a perod of 4 weeks from today, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.