Nma/4272/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. Shoba Kapoor
High Court
04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4272/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. Shoba Kapoor
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/4272/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum,City-Ii v. Shoba Kapoor, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4272 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2273 OF 2007
The CIT City-11 ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Shobha Kapoor ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.K.Gopal & Jitendra Singh for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4th March, 2008.
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 499 days delay in
filing the appeal. On perusal of
affidavit-in-support, we find that no dates have
been given in respect of any of the events which
occurred between the passing of the order dated
20.12.2005 and the lodging of the appeal on
28.9.2007. In our view, therefore, the cause shown
does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion
dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2273 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2273 OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue