Nma/4324/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -- 4 ,Mumbai v. M/S Mardia Tubes Limited
High Court
07 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4324/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -- 4 ,Mumbai v. M/S Mardia Tubes Limited
Date of order
07 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/4324/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -- 4 ,Mumbai v. M/S Mardia Tubes Limited, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4324 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4324 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4324 OF 2007
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2154 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2154 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mardia Tubes Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mrs.P.S.Bhosale for appellant.
Mr.Sanjiv Shah for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the
affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion.
The Motion is filed for condonation of 229 days delay
in filing the above appeal. Sufficient cause is shown
for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
appellant. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (a). Appeal be numbered.
3. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes
to serve the copy of the appeal memo along with the
annexures to the respondent within one week from today.
5. Appeal be placed for hearing after 3 weeks.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.