Nma/433/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Kamadgiri Synthitics Ltd
High Court
17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/433/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Kamadgiri Synthitics Ltd
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/433/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Kamadgiri Synthitics Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.433 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.185 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.433 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.185 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Kamadgiri Synthetics Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant.
Mrs.Vasanti B. Patel for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 291 days in filing the
appeal. The delay was occasioned on account of the
file pending in the Ministry of Law till 28/10/2005 and
thereafter the appeal was filed on 3/2/2006. There is
no explanation for the delay from 28/10/2005 to
3/2/2006. Considering the above, in our opinion, the
cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue