Case LawHigh Court › Nma/435/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/435/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Zahid Abbas Mankad

High Court 14 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/435/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Zahid Abbas Mankad
Date of order
14 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/435/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Zahid Abbas Mankad, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within a perod of 4 weeks from today, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 435 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 129 OF 2018 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20Mumbai .. Applicant In the matter betweenThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20Mumbai .. Appellant v/s. Zahid Abbas Mankad ..Respondent Ms. Padma Divakar for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. DATED : 14[th] JUNE, 2018. P.C. 1.Ms. Divakar, learned Counsel for the applicant-Revenue states that the respondent is served and she undertakes to file an affidavit of service on or before 18[th] June, 2018. 2.This application seeks condonation of 67 day delay in filing the accompanying appeal from the order dated 3[rd] May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 3.We have perused the affidavit-in-support of the present application filed by Ms. Sheela Jacob, ITO dated 7[th] May, 2018 and are satisifed with the reasons indicated therein. 4.The Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within a perod of 4 weeks from today, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan