Nma/4373/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. West Coast Builders Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai
High Court
05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4373/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. West Coast Builders Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/4373/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. West Coast Builders Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4373 OF 2006
ININCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.2607 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-5..Appellant Mumbai
V/s.
M/s.West Coast Builders Pvt.Ltd...RespondentMumbai
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak, Advocate, forRespondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
P.C.
.This is a notice of motion for condonationof 233 days delay in preferring the main appeal.We have perused the affidavit in support. Takinginto account the facts stated in the affidavit insupport, we propose to accept the cause shown forcondonation of delay subject to levy of costs.Notice of motion is therefore, allowed and thedelay in filing the appeal stands condoned subjectto payment of costs of Rs.5000/- which is to be
paid directly to the respondent within a period offour weeks from today. Office to number the appealand list the same for admission.
2.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.