Nma/4384/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 21, Mumbai v. Shri Kunal H. Zaveri
High Court
10 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4384/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 21, Mumbai v. Shri Kunal H. Zaveri
Date of order
10 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/4384/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 21, Mumbai v. Shri Kunal H. Zaveri, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4384 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2456 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Kunal H.ZaveriMr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
..Appellant
..Respondent
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2008
P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.None appeared for the Respondent, though served.Affidavit of service is filed on record. By thisNotice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonationof delay caused in filing the above Appeal. Perusedthe Notice of Motion and Affidavit in support thereof.For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause ismade out. There is no case of inaction, negligence orwant of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence,
the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue