Nma/4394/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 12, Mumbai v. M/S. Paramount Properties , Mumbai
High Court
23 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4394/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 12, Mumbai v. M/S. Paramount Properties , Mumbai
Date of order
23 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/4394/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 12, Mumbai v. M/S. Paramount Properties , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4394 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2354 OF 2008WITHINCOME APPEAL LODGING NO.2354 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-12...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Paramound Properties...Respondents.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondents.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 23rd January, 2009.PC :
1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office
to register the appeal.
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2354 OF 2008
1. In so far as question of law as framed is concernedthe tribunal has recorded the finding that the assesseewas following project completion method. The Tribunalhas also followed the order in the case of assessee forthe earlier years. In the light of that, in ouropinion, the question of law as framed would not arise.
Consequently, appeal dismissed. Refund of court fee as
per rules. Certified copy expedited.
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue