Case Law › High Court › Nma/4404/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/4404/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Ii,Mum v. M/S Tips Industries P.ltd

High Court 23 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Jan 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/4404/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Ii,Mum v. M/S Tips Industries P.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Failure to deposit the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4404 of 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1283 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Central II...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Tips Industries Pvt. Ltd...Respondents.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. Deepak Tralshawala and V.S. Hadade for theRespondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 23rd January, 2009. PC : 1. Considering the cause shown and the tax effect,delay condoned subject to the appellant paying costsquantified at Rs.10,000/- to be paid to the respondentswithin a period of six weeks from today. On suchpayment, appeal to be registered. Failure to deposit the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)( F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.