In Nma/452/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Mumbai City-V,Mumbai v. The Mafatlal Fine Spg And Mfg Co.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.452 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.243 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax.City - V, Mumbai....AppellantV/s.The Mafatlal Fine SPG & MFG Co. Ltd....Respondent
Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.Ms.V.B. Patel for the Respondent.
P.C. :
1.The delay is less than 200 days. Consideringthe delay in the Law Department, in our opinion, thecause shown would amount to suficient cause. In thelight of that Motion made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue