Nma/4522/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Lupin Investments Pvt. Ltd
High Court
28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4522/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Lupin Investments Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/4522/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Lupin Investments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4522 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2687 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10Mumbai..Appellant
M/s Lupin Investments Pvt.Ltd.. Respondents
Mr.S.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMs.V.B.Patel for Respondents
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 251 days delay caused in filing theappeal.
1. Perused the affidavit in support of the noticeof motion. The appeal is against the order dated23rd November, 2005. The Commissioner of IncomeTax had granted approval for filing an appeal on1st February 2006 the appeal was filed only on18th December, 2006. We are not satisfied withthe reasons given for condonation of delay. Thereasons given for delay that of administrativedifficulties and that the appellant was diigently
following the matter in filing the above appeal.No sufficient cause is made out for condonation ofdelay. Hence, Notice of motion stands dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of Notice of motion,Income Tax Apeal (Lodging) No.2687 of 2006 alsostands dismissed.
(A.V.Nirgude, J)
(A.V.Nirgude, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.