Nma/4526/2006 Of Dilip Gajanan Shintre v. Income Tax Officer Pune And Ors
High Court
16 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4526/2006 Of Dilip Gajanan Shintre v. Income Tax Officer Pune And Ors
Date of order
16 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/4526/2006 Of Dilip Gajanan Shintre v. Income Tax Officer Pune And Ors, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4526 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4526 OF 2006
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1888 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1888 OF 2006
Dilip Gajanan Shintre ..Appellant.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Pune & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Ajay A. Joshi for appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for respondents.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
the learned counsel for the respondent. By this Notice
of Motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 1155
days delay in filing the above appeal. Perused the
affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. It
appears that the appellant had wrongly approached the
Civil Appellate Side of this Court by filing First
Appeal (St) No.24414 of 2004 with Civil Application No.
50076 of 2005 and finally this Court by an order dated
21st August, 2006 allowed the appellant to withdraw the
said appeal along with the Civil Application with
liberty to file appropriate proceedings. Hence the
present Notice of Motion with Income Tax Appeal is
filed on 26/12/2006. Having regard to the aforesaid
facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the
bonafide mistake, we are inclined to condone the delay.
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a). Appeal be numbered.
2. Place the appeal on board for hearing in
July, 2008.
3. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.