Nma/4572/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd
High Court
25 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/4572/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd
Date of order
25 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/4572/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4572 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2513 OF 2006
The CIT-2 ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Tata Sons Ltd., ..Respondents
----
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale &
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 25.02.2008.
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 1044 days delay
in filing the appeal. A perusal of
affidavit-in-support indicates that the CCIT-2
granted approval for filing the appeal on 10.12.2003
and thereafter the matter was sent to panel Advocate
for drafting the appeal memo. It appears that
thereafter a letter was written for court fee stamps
and subsequently appeal was filed on 28.11.2006. No
dates have been given in respect of events which
occurred between the aforesaid two dates. In our
view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2513 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2513 OF 2006
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.