Nma/460/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2 v. Bank Of India
High Court
22 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/460/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2 v. Bank Of India
Date of order
22 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/460/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2 v. Bank Of India, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
452-18-NMA-16-C=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 452 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 262 OF 2018ALONG WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 460 OF 2018IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 261 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
.. Applicant
In the matter between
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
.. Appellant
v/s.
Bank of India ..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Subhash Shetty for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 22[nd] JUNE, 2018.
1.These notices of motion have been taken out seekingcondonation of one day delay in filing the appeals from the order dated26[th] July, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.We have perused the affidavit of Mr. Dinesh A. Chaurasia, Jt.CIT in support of the motions. We are satisfied with the reasons
452-18-NMA-16-C=.doc
indicated therein.
3.Accordingly, both the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms ofprayer clause (a)
4.Needless to state that if the office objections are not removedwithin a period of four weeks from today, the appeals shall standdismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.