Case LawHigh Court › Nma/461/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Ta...

Nma/461/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax-Iv, Mumbai v. Dr. Pradeep Kothadiya

High Court 02 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/461/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax-Iv, Mumbai v. Dr. Pradeep Kothadiya
Date of order
02 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/461/2004 Of Commissionr Of Income Tax-Iv, Mumbai v. Dr. Pradeep Kothadiya, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motionthe appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

after lapse of about 3 years. The affidavit in support of Notice of Motion does not give any reason whatsoeverfor delay in taking out the aforesaid Notice of Motionafter lapse of 3 years. In view thereof there is nosufficient cause made out. Hence Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motionthe appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan