Case Law › High Court › Nma/463/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/463/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. Sarayu Investements Ltd, Mumbai

High Court 17 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/463/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S. Sarayu Investements Ltd, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.463 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (l) NO.2432 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-5 )..Appellant V/s. M/s.Sarayu Investments Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 17.02.2009. PC 1. This is a Notice of Motion for condonation of 608 days delay in filing of the appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the approval for filing the appeal was granted on 14.11.2006 and the draft appeal was thereafter received on 28.7.2008. The delay caused between the period 14.11.2006 and 28.7.2008 has not been properly explained. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. Consequently appeal papers to be filed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.