In Nma/469/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Mumabi v. Vikram H. Gandhi, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motionthe appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.469 OF 2004WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.275 of 2002The Commissioer of Income TaxIV, Pune.... AppellantV/sVikram H.Gandhi... RespondentMr.P.S.Sahaderan for AppellantNone for the RespondentCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant.2. By this Notice of Motion the Appellant is prayingfor setting aside the order dated 5-3-2001 passed bythe learned Prothonotary and Senior Master dismissingthe above appeal for non removal of office objections.The Notice of Motion is taken out on 12-2-2004 i.e.
after lapse of almost 3 years. The affidavit in
there is no sufficient cause is made out. Hence Notice
of Motion stands dismissed.
3. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motionthe appeal stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue