Case Law › High Court › Nma/490/2018 Of Harakchand K Shah v. The...

Nma/490/2018 Of Harakchand K Shah v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 12 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/490/2018 Of Harakchand K Shah v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failingwhich the Appeal would stand dismissed without furtherreference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

* 1/2 * NMA-490-2018 (SR.1) Thursday, 12.7.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 490 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 966 OF 2018 Harakchand K. Shah ….Applicant(Original Appellant) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Harakchand K. Shah….AppellantV/s.The Income Tax Officer….Respondent * * * * * Mr. Dharmesh Singh i/by. Law Competere Consultus,Advocate for the applicant-original appellant. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-12TH JULY, 2018. P.C. :- 1.None appears for the respondent despite service. Rane * 2/2 * NMA-490-2018 (SR.1)Thursday, 12.7.2018 2.This application seeks condonation of 11 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the order dated 4th September, 2017 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal). 3. We have perused the Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion dated 4th September, 2017 of theapplicant in support of the Motion. We are satisfied withthe reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing theaccompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the Notice of Motionis allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failingwhich the Appeal would stand dismissed without furtherreference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.