Case LawHigh Court › Nma/498/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/498/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii,Mum v. M/S Crest Communication P.ltd

High Court 01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/498/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii,Mum v. M/S Crest Communication P.ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/498/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii,Mum v. M/S Crest Communication P.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.498 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.195 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.498 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.195 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Crest Communication P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 302 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit of Mr.K.Mohandas in support of the Motion. There is an additional affidavit of Mr.Manoj Kumar filed on 29/9/2007. The delay between 8/4/2005 and 30/11/2005 has occasioned in the Law Ministry over which the appellant had really no control. The draft after receipt appears to have been scrutinised by the assessing officer and certain recommendations were made and the draft was collected by the panel counsel in the second week of January, 2006 and appeal was filed on 7/2/2006. Considering the cause shown, in our opinion, it would amount to sufficient cause. Hence delay is condoned. Office to register the appeal. Motion disposed of. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan