In Nma/498/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. Shri. Kripashankar Chaturvedi, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASNIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 498 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income Tax City 20. ..Appellant.Vs.Shri. Kripashankar Chaturvedi...Respondent.Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 12TH FEBRUARY,2009.
PC
:
1. Issue notice to the respondent made returnable afterfour weeks.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.