Case LawHigh Court › Nma/498/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/498/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. Shri. Kripashankar Chaturvedi

High Court 12 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/498/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. Shri. Kripashankar Chaturvedi
Date of order
12 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/498/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. Shri. Kripashankar Chaturvedi, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ASNIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 498 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income Tax City 20. ..Appellant.Vs.Shri. Kripashankar Chaturvedi...Respondent.Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 12TH FEBRUARY,2009. PC : 1. Issue notice to the respondent made returnable afterfour weeks. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan