Case LawHigh Court › Nma/539/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/539/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Rajesh M. Khandhar

High Court 18 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/539/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Rajesh M. Khandhar
Date of order
18 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/539/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Rajesh M. Khandhar, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 539 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.226 OF 2006 The Commissioner of IncomeTax-13....AppellantsV/s.Shri.Rajesh M.Khandhar....Respondents. ====== Mr.Benny Chatterji, adv.for appellant.Mr.K.Gopal with Mr.Jitendra Singh, Advocate for therespondent. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATED: 18TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. : 1. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant andlearned counsel for the respondent. There is 289 daysdelay in filing the instant appeal. 2. We have perused the affidavit-in-reply of themotion. In our opinion, in the interest of justice delay deserves to be condoned, subject to payment ofcosts by the appellant to the respondent. Hence, delayis condoned, subject to the appellant paying costsquantified at Rs.2,500/- to the respondent within aperiod of 4 weeks from today. Motion disposed off. (SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan