Nma/552/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 24, Mumbai v. Shri Ahmed Aliji Nandoliya
High Court
10 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/552/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 24, Mumbai v. Shri Ahmed Aliji Nandoliya
Date of order
10 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/552/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 24, Mumbai v. Shri Ahmed Aliji Nandoliya, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: DATED : 10TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. :- The Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration of the appeal which stands dismissed for non compliance of the conditional order dated 15 June, 2009 for removal of objections.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.552 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.267 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Ahmed Aliji Nandoliya
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for appellant.
Dr. P. Daniel i/b. Mr. V.S. Hadade for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 10TH JUNE, 2010
P.C. :-
The Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration of the appeal which stands dismissed for non compliance of the conditional order dated 15 June, 2009 for removal of objections. It has been brought to our notice that the order impugned in the appeal has been passed by the Ahmedabad Bench of the Tribunal on 18 May, 2007. In the circumstance, it would be appropriate for this Court to recall the orders dated 15 June, 2009 and 23 July, 2009. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). The Motion is accordingly disposed of.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue