In Nma/58/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Kirti M. Dugad, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.58 of 2006InINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.293 of 2005The Commissioner of Income Tax IIA Wing, Pune..AppellantV/sKirit M. Dugad.. RespondentMr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantNone present for the RespondentCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant. Bythis Notice of Motion the Appellant is challenging theorder dated 29-4-2005 passed by the learnedProthonotary and Senior Mister thereby dismissing theabove appeal for non removal office objections.Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support
thereof. Delay caused in filing the present appeal is
of 157 days.
2. None appears for the Respondent though served.
Affidavit of service is already taken on record.
3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support
passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master dated
29-4-2005 shall stand restored.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue