Nma/59/2018 Of Hicons Constructions v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle - 36 And Anr
High Court
16 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/59/2018 Of Hicons Constructions v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle - 36 And Anr
Date of order
16 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/59/2018 Of Hicons Constructions v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle - 36 And Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 59 of 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3135 OF 2017
M/s. Hicons Constructions ... ApplicantIn the matter betweenM/s. Hicons Constructions ... Appellant v/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 36 & Anr. .. Respondents
Ms. Neha Paranjape for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. N.C. Mohanty for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J.
DATED : 16[th] FEBRUARY, 2018.
1.This Notice of Motion has been taken out to condone the delay of
88 days in filing the appeal from the order dated 31[st] March, 2017 of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.Perused the affidavit in support dated 14[th] December, 2017 of Mr.
Mohd. Rafique Shaikh, partner of the applicant and we are satisfied
with the reasons stated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying
appeal.
3.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a).
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue