Nma/593/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Alkon Plastics Pvt Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/593/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Alkon Plastics Pvt Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/593/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Alkon Plastics Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of dismissal of notice of motion, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 593 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 593 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 593 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2117 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2117 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions & :
Prothonotary’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
Mr P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the
Appellant.
Mr S. G. Dalal, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.P.C.:
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the
Parties.
2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit
in support thereof.
3. By this notice of motion, the appellant
is seeking condonation of 700 days dalay in
filing the appeal. Perusal of the said
affidavit indicates that the file was sent to
the Ministry of Law for drafting memo of
appeal on 9.8.2006 and the appeal was filed on
19.9.2007 and the last date for filing appeal
was 19.10.2005. There is absolutely no
explanation as to why almost more than two
years time was spent in drafting the memo of
appeal.
4. In the above circumstances, we are left
with no alternative but to dismiss the notice
of motion for want of sufficient cause in
filing the appeal belatedly.
5. In the result, notice of motion stands
dismissed.
6. In view of dismissal of notice of
motion, appeal also stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.