In Nma/60/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Pravin M. Dugad, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
thereof. Delay caused in filing the present appeal is
of 157 days.
2. None appears for the Respondent though served.
Affidavit of service is already taken on record.
3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in supportof Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is being made outfor condoning the delay. There is no case of inactionor negligance on the part of the Appellant. Hence the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clauses (a) and (b).
4. Appellant to remove office objections within aperiod of two weeks, failing which the earlier order
passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master dated
29-4-2005 shall stand restored.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue